Blog Feeds
07-09 12:30 PM
Just hours after the announcement that DHS will seek to rescind the controversial social security no-match rule, the Senate may consider an amendment to the DHS spending bill that has been introduced by Senator David Vitter (R-LA). Amendment 1375 would bar DHS from revoking the rule and require its implementation. The amendment language is as follows: Sec. 556. None of the amounts made available under this Act may be used to-- (1) amend, rewrite, or change the final rule requiring Federal Contractors to use E-Verify (promulgated on November 14, 2008); (2) further delay the implementation of the rule described in...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/senate-may-consider-bill-to-reimpose-nomatch-rule.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/senate-may-consider-bill-to-reimpose-nomatch-rule.html)
wallpaper men hairstyles medium
desi485
08-13 04:18 PM
good news Bulletin + 485 got approved today only
Congrates!!! hopefully others will get good news soon. Wish good luck to our EB3 bros too!
Congrates!!! hopefully others will get good news soon. Wish good luck to our EB3 bros too!
das0
12-09 11:45 AM
folks, will appreciate if you please refer a attorney to me
2011 Long Men#39;s Hairstyles
Macaca
06-12 07:33 AM
The System at Work (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/11/AR2007061101859.html) By E. J. Dionne Jr. (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/e.+j.+dionne+jr./) (postchat@aol.com), Tuesday, June 12, 2007
We have become political hypochondriacs. We seem eager to declare that "the system" has come down with some dread disease, to proclaim that an ideological "center" blessed by the heavens no longer exists, and woe unto us. An imperfect immigration bill is pulled from the Senate floor, and you'd think the Capitol dome had caved in.
It's all nonsense, but it is not harmless nonsense. The tendency to blame the system is a convenient way of leaving no one accountable. Those who offer this argument can sound sage without having to grapple with the specifics of any piece of legislation. There is the unspoken assumption that wisdom always lies in the political middle, no matter how unsavory the recipe served up by a given group of self-proclaimed centrists might be.
And when Republicans and Democrats are battling each other with particular ferocity, there is always a call for the appearance of an above-the-battle savior who will seize the presidency as an independent. This messiah, it is said, will transcend such "petty" concerns as philosophy or ideology.
Finally, those who attack the system don't actually want to change it much. For example, there's a very good case for abolishing the U.S. Senate. It often distorts the popular will since senators representing 18 percent of the population can cast a majority of the Senate's votes. And as Sen. John McCain said over the weekend, "The Senate works in a way that relatively small numbers can block legislation."
But many of the system-blamers in fact love Senate rules that, in principle, push senators toward the middle in seeking solutions. So they actually like the system more than they let on.
As it happens, I wish the immigration bill's supporters had gotten it through -- not because I think this is great legislation but because some bill has to get out of the Senate so real discussions on a final proposal can begin.
Notice how tepid that paragraph is. The truth is that most supporters of this bill find a lot of things in it they don't like. The guest-worker program, in particular, strikes me as terribly flawed. The bill's opponents, on the other hand, absolutely hate it because they see it as an effective amnesty for 12 million illegal immigrants. And, boy, did those opponents mobilize. In well-functioning democracies, mobilized minorities often defeat unenthusiastic majorities.
And some "centrist" compromises are more coherent and politically salable than others. Neither side on the immigration issue has the popular support to get exactly what it wants. So a bill aimed at creating a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants is full of grudging concessions to the anti-immigration side. These have the effect of demobilizing the very groups that support the underlying principles of this bill. That's not a system problem. It just happens that immigration is a hard issue that arouses real passion.
Typically, advocates of the system-breakdown theory move quickly from immigration to the failure of President Bush's Social Security proposals. Why, they ask, can't the system "fix" entitlements?
The simple truth is that a majority of Americans (I'm one of them) came to oppose Bush's privatization ideas. That reflected both a principled stand and a practical judgment. From our perspective, a proposal to cut benefits and create private accounts was radical, not centrist.
An authentically "centrist" solution to this problem would involve some modest benefit cuts and some modest tax increases. It will happen someday. But for now, conservatives don't want to support any tax increases. I think the conservatives are wrong, and they'd argue that they're principled. What we have here is a political disagreement, not a system problem. We have these things called elections to settle political disagreements.
Is Washington a mess? In many ways it is. The simplest explanation has to do with some bad choices made by President Bush. He started a misguided war that is now sapping his influence; he has treated Democrats as if they were infected with tuberculosis and Republicans in Congress as if they were his valets. No wonder he's having trouble pushing through a bill whose main opponents are his own ideological allies.
Maybe you would place blame elsewhere. But please identify some real people or real political forces and not just some faceless entity that you call the system. Please be specific, bearing in mind that when hypochondriacs misdiagnose vague ailments they don't have, they often miss the real ones.
We have become political hypochondriacs. We seem eager to declare that "the system" has come down with some dread disease, to proclaim that an ideological "center" blessed by the heavens no longer exists, and woe unto us. An imperfect immigration bill is pulled from the Senate floor, and you'd think the Capitol dome had caved in.
It's all nonsense, but it is not harmless nonsense. The tendency to blame the system is a convenient way of leaving no one accountable. Those who offer this argument can sound sage without having to grapple with the specifics of any piece of legislation. There is the unspoken assumption that wisdom always lies in the political middle, no matter how unsavory the recipe served up by a given group of self-proclaimed centrists might be.
And when Republicans and Democrats are battling each other with particular ferocity, there is always a call for the appearance of an above-the-battle savior who will seize the presidency as an independent. This messiah, it is said, will transcend such "petty" concerns as philosophy or ideology.
Finally, those who attack the system don't actually want to change it much. For example, there's a very good case for abolishing the U.S. Senate. It often distorts the popular will since senators representing 18 percent of the population can cast a majority of the Senate's votes. And as Sen. John McCain said over the weekend, "The Senate works in a way that relatively small numbers can block legislation."
But many of the system-blamers in fact love Senate rules that, in principle, push senators toward the middle in seeking solutions. So they actually like the system more than they let on.
As it happens, I wish the immigration bill's supporters had gotten it through -- not because I think this is great legislation but because some bill has to get out of the Senate so real discussions on a final proposal can begin.
Notice how tepid that paragraph is. The truth is that most supporters of this bill find a lot of things in it they don't like. The guest-worker program, in particular, strikes me as terribly flawed. The bill's opponents, on the other hand, absolutely hate it because they see it as an effective amnesty for 12 million illegal immigrants. And, boy, did those opponents mobilize. In well-functioning democracies, mobilized minorities often defeat unenthusiastic majorities.
And some "centrist" compromises are more coherent and politically salable than others. Neither side on the immigration issue has the popular support to get exactly what it wants. So a bill aimed at creating a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants is full of grudging concessions to the anti-immigration side. These have the effect of demobilizing the very groups that support the underlying principles of this bill. That's not a system problem. It just happens that immigration is a hard issue that arouses real passion.
Typically, advocates of the system-breakdown theory move quickly from immigration to the failure of President Bush's Social Security proposals. Why, they ask, can't the system "fix" entitlements?
The simple truth is that a majority of Americans (I'm one of them) came to oppose Bush's privatization ideas. That reflected both a principled stand and a practical judgment. From our perspective, a proposal to cut benefits and create private accounts was radical, not centrist.
An authentically "centrist" solution to this problem would involve some modest benefit cuts and some modest tax increases. It will happen someday. But for now, conservatives don't want to support any tax increases. I think the conservatives are wrong, and they'd argue that they're principled. What we have here is a political disagreement, not a system problem. We have these things called elections to settle political disagreements.
Is Washington a mess? In many ways it is. The simplest explanation has to do with some bad choices made by President Bush. He started a misguided war that is now sapping his influence; he has treated Democrats as if they were infected with tuberculosis and Republicans in Congress as if they were his valets. No wonder he's having trouble pushing through a bill whose main opponents are his own ideological allies.
Maybe you would place blame elsewhere. But please identify some real people or real political forces and not just some faceless entity that you call the system. Please be specific, bearing in mind that when hypochondriacs misdiagnose vague ailments they don't have, they often miss the real ones.
more...
Blog Feeds
07-30 03:50 PM
One of the comments on my post earlier today about the killed Border Patrol agent seemed pretty harsh - accusing most BP agents of being restrictionists with bad motives. I still think that's harsh and most Border Patrol agents are honestly out to do the necessary job of protecting our country's borders. But the timing of a major scandal involving Customs and Border Patrol certainly will make many people question just who the agency is hiring. According to the NY Times: After federal border agents detained several Mexican immigrants in western New York in June, an article about the incident...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/feds-investigating-border-patrol-agents-racist-web-posting.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/feds-investigating-border-patrol-agents-racist-web-posting.html)
webm
08-14 05:00 PM
Actually your Initial filed Labor Application/approval notice or attorney can help you identify on this piece of Info.
more...
gani123
06-04 07:32 PM
Hey All,
If you guys need any help in getting admission or if you are looking for the university that is offering full time CPT from the 1st semester just let me know, i am gonna help you out.
Our university is offering CPT from the 1st semester .This is also helpful if some changing the status (fromH4 to F1 or F2 to F1).If you have any question,you can reach me through email: gani.ojja@gmail.com.
Thank you,
If you guys need any help in getting admission or if you are looking for the university that is offering full time CPT from the 1st semester just let me know, i am gonna help you out.
Our university is offering CPT from the 1st semester .This is also helpful if some changing the status (fromH4 to F1 or F2 to F1).If you have any question,you can reach me through email: gani.ojja@gmail.com.
Thank you,
2010 Popular mens hair styles
yourvijay
07-07 01:49 PM
My case is similar to you. I mentioned as "AOS". I got a confirmation email about my change of address.
more...
neerajkandhari
10-22 12:16 PM
I have filed for 485 /EAD and AP on july 2 2007
receipt date is July 2 2007
Notice date is Aug 29 2007
I see the processing time is 90 day at Texas
I called USCIS and they tell me that they count processing time from the Notice date and not from the date when the case was filed
We have travel plans for this Dec
Can some one pls guide me how and when i can get my AP soon
receipt date is July 2 2007
Notice date is Aug 29 2007
I see the processing time is 90 day at Texas
I called USCIS and they tell me that they count processing time from the Notice date and not from the date when the case was filed
We have travel plans for this Dec
Can some one pls guide me how and when i can get my AP soon
hair Long Layered Hairstyle For Men
Foster2007
07-08 10:51 PM
All,
Over the past few days we have been successful in getting good media attention BUT except for NYT, the coverage has not focused on the issues that are relevant and will draw the attention of the policymakers. I think the media drive should focus on getting the following issues highlighted:
1. Lapse in protocol when issuing green cards
a) Green cards issued WITHOUT security clearence
b) Green cards issued to those whose PD was NOT current in June
2. Obvious intent to NOT accept applications in July so that they can receive the same with a higher fee in the future. This at the cost of making a mockery of hundreds of thousand of hopeful legal immigrants
I think the media drive should focus and highlight the above and other key issues rather than merely reporting on the sequence of events. Please share your thoughts and add to the list above
Over the past few days we have been successful in getting good media attention BUT except for NYT, the coverage has not focused on the issues that are relevant and will draw the attention of the policymakers. I think the media drive should focus on getting the following issues highlighted:
1. Lapse in protocol when issuing green cards
a) Green cards issued WITHOUT security clearence
b) Green cards issued to those whose PD was NOT current in June
2. Obvious intent to NOT accept applications in July so that they can receive the same with a higher fee in the future. This at the cost of making a mockery of hundreds of thousand of hopeful legal immigrants
I think the media drive should focus and highlight the above and other key issues rather than merely reporting on the sequence of events. Please share your thoughts and add to the list above
more...
snathan
05-19 04:27 PM
yup. you should have completed 180 days I guess after getting 140 approved. There are many threads for this discussion. try to find it.
Its not for the I-140. If you have completed 180 days after applying I-485 & I-140 approved, you can use the AC21. But if you have only I-140, there is no use.
Its not for the I-140. If you have completed 180 days after applying I-485 & I-140 approved, you can use the AC21. But if you have only I-140, there is no use.
hot long hair styles for men
anilsal
12-28 03:59 PM
Call tonight at 9pm.
Members from states neighboring IL are welcome to join.
Members from states neighboring IL are welcome to join.
more...
house Long Haircut for Boy
freddyCR
January 6th, 2005, 08:13 AM
I shot this pic in the backside of the medieval Torres de Serranos in Valencia. I quite like the symmetry. What do you think?
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/2555doors-1_Medium_.jpg
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/500/2555doors-1_Medium_.jpg
tattoo hairstyles hair styles men
madhu_rao73
08-19 12:40 PM
Hi, i have applied my labor application eb3 in 2003 august and got approveed, applied 140 and 485 in july 2007 and i am on EAD
i came to USA on Company A in august 2000 and moved to Company B on 2003 march and applied for green card in EB3
now my company A is willing to apply my gc in EB2 and capture EB3 pd
but my lawyer says if my EB2 gets rejected they may not issue my GC saying that my new job is not same or similar (he says eb3 job which does not require Master is not same as EB2 which requires Master or 5+ years exp)
Company A and Company B are belongs to same management so the compnay is ready to do my EB2, but my lawyer is telling there is lot of risk involved
Please Advice
Thanks
i came to USA on Company A in august 2000 and moved to Company B on 2003 march and applied for green card in EB3
now my company A is willing to apply my gc in EB2 and capture EB3 pd
but my lawyer says if my EB2 gets rejected they may not issue my GC saying that my new job is not same or similar (he says eb3 job which does not require Master is not same as EB2 which requires Master or 5+ years exp)
Company A and Company B are belongs to same management so the compnay is ready to do my EB2, but my lawyer is telling there is lot of risk involved
Please Advice
Thanks
more...
pictures 2005 men long hairstyle
jasonpark
August 17th, 2005, 03:18 PM
Monarch
dresses Long Hair styles fashion for
akash016
01-29 03:36 PM
Hello Seniors,
Can you please let me know what is the process to open an already approved case in USCIS? Is it possible ?
Your help really vital for me.
Thanks a lot
Can you please let me know what is the process to open an already approved case in USCIS? Is it possible ?
Your help really vital for me.
Thanks a lot
more...
makeup Semi-Long Men#39;s Haircut.
Asian
01-16 01:28 PM
Considering many limitations to move a job from non-profit to for-profit, I am considering moving my job to another non profit. With my current employer, my 6 year H-1 B will expire by the end of next year April. So if my change my employer, I will have a very short time to start the process again till I reach I -140 approval again with the new employer.
I heard that from non-profit to for-profit, you are subject to the quota and you have to apply for H-1B quota. But in this case, your previous 6 year with non profit doesn't count.
But if I move from non-profit to non-profit, do I have to reach I-140 approval before my current H-1 B with my current employer expires? Or do I just get another 3 year with new non-profit employer?
If I have to get I-140 approval with new non-profit employer before my current 6 year H-1 B expires, is it doable?
Thank you for your advice!
I heard that from non-profit to for-profit, you are subject to the quota and you have to apply for H-1B quota. But in this case, your previous 6 year with non profit doesn't count.
But if I move from non-profit to non-profit, do I have to reach I-140 approval before my current H-1 B with my current employer expires? Or do I just get another 3 year with new non-profit employer?
If I have to get I-140 approval with new non-profit employer before my current 6 year H-1 B expires, is it doable?
Thank you for your advice!
girlfriend unique long men hairstyle.jpg
Moillychalanglninu
04-27 07:05 AM
Today, I visited this forum so I found that it's very interested for me.. there are many topics available here so I like this so much.....
I hope that you will read care fully and tell me more benifits about this .........
I hope that you will read care fully and tell me more benifits about this .........
hairstyles long hairstyles for men with
needhelp!
01-23 01:34 PM
When: Saturday, 24th Jan during Thawer Law RADIO show at 3 pm Central
Where: 700 AM if you are in dfw area or listen online @ funasia.net
Where: 700 AM if you are in dfw area or listen online @ funasia.net
amslonewolf
04-16 03:30 PM
Hi - I am just wondering, if Medical residency applications are subject to the yearly 65,000 Quota? Does anyone know?
Sandeep
01-18 05:24 PM
http://uscis.gov/graphics/services/tempbenefits/cap.htm
Now I hope the industry will get its act together
Now I hope the industry will get its act together
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário