aswitcher
Nov 3, 08:10 PM
Ok i thought i would start this thread just so we can have a list of must have free apps, mainly for the newbies, but also for the oldbies to share the ones they already have...
my must haves are
MacStumbler (http://www.macstumbler.com/)
(finds Wireless Networks)
I have found Kismac superior.
my must haves are
MacStumbler (http://www.macstumbler.com/)
(finds Wireless Networks)
I have found Kismac superior.
ranviper
Feb 1, 10:22 AM
February already, Here's mine........For now
Source of Original (http://tomkoole.com/includes/pages/wallpapers/dailies/100113_Streak.png)
Icon set? :rolleyes:
Source of Original (http://tomkoole.com/includes/pages/wallpapers/dailies/100113_Streak.png)
Icon set? :rolleyes:
pacmania1982
Apr 21, 07:13 PM
My new 15.2" PowerBook G4 867MHz machine. I sold my G3 500 and got this one. Its the last one to boot OS 9 and the slowest Mac to boot 10.5 natively without any fiddling
Shows my apps currently installed
pac
Shows my apps currently installed
pac
Abyssgh0st
Apr 10, 11:29 PM
Saw this in the dealership today. I want one. Who knows, when I have $118,000 I might give it a try :p
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4110/5602889077_c04c22a79b_z.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/maxumphoto/5602889077/)
Yellow Beast (http://www.flickr.com/photos/maxumphoto/5602889077/) by Hisdem (http://www.flickr.com/people/maxumphoto/), on Flickr
$118,00? Really? I am floored that anyone would pay even half that for that car.
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4110/5602889077_c04c22a79b_z.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/maxumphoto/5602889077/)
Yellow Beast (http://www.flickr.com/photos/maxumphoto/5602889077/) by Hisdem (http://www.flickr.com/people/maxumphoto/), on Flickr
$118,00? Really? I am floored that anyone would pay even half that for that car.
more...
jsf8x
Aug 10, 05:42 PM
Mine for the month :)
http://i186.photobucket.com/albums/x159/eliteguard98/Screenshot2010-08-10at64137PM.png
http://i186.photobucket.com/albums/x159/eliteguard98/Screenshot2010-08-10at64137PM.png
peapody
Dec 26, 01:37 PM
I didn't get anything for christmas but cupcakes and a nice dinner.
more...
cute friendship quotes wallpapers. cute friendship quotes; cute friendship quotes. Paix247. Jan 11, 01:19 PM. Yes! Something interesting to discuss on a
friends quotes wallpapers.
more...
friendship quotes wallpapers. love quotes Friendship day; love quotes Friendship day. MacFan782040. Oct 6, 11:53 PM. I have to say-- I was with Verizon for
cute friendship quotes wallpapers. cute friendship quotes with; cute friendship quotes with. PBF. Apr 24, 02:44 PM. Heres another image with the new
more...
cute friendship quotes
wallpapers of friendship
more...
cute friendship quotes
friends quotes wallpaper.
more...
friendship quotes wallpapers. malcolm x quotes wallpaper. malcolm x quotes wallpaper. macidiot. Jul 12, 04:03 AM
cute friendship quotes wallpapers. quotes o cute friends; quotes o cute friends. QCassidy352
more...
friends quotes wallpaper.
friendship quotes wallpapers.
friendship quotes wallpapers. Friendship Quotes - Friendship; Friendship Quotes - Friendship. rahrens. Sep 21, 08:33 AM. the iTV doesn#39;t do HD either.
more...
barca10
Feb 1, 10:44 AM
Clean Black & Red
FX4568
Apr 4, 10:24 PM
Phew. Thanks for clearing that up for us. Until you explained it so well I was really worried.
Well, this is macrumors and i try to stay away from economic theories, but you asked for it, so here we go:
Monopolies cause "allocative deadweight loss" (although its main argument applies towards state-owned enterprises)
What does that mean?
In a competitive market, producers dont have the freedom to set a price because the rival can always undercut them until the point where lowering the price will cause in a loss.
BUT the monopolist firm can decide the price it charges by varying the quantity it produces, so it will produce only up to the quantity where its profit is maximized. UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES, the level of output is lower than the socially optimal one, which is where the max price a consumer is willing to pay is the same as the minimum price that the producer requires in order not to lose money.
When the amount produced is LESS than the socially optimal quantity, it means not serving some consumers who are perfectly willing to pay MORE than the minimum price that the producer requires but who are unwilling to bear the price at which the monopoly firm can max its profit. The unfulfilled desire of those neglected consumers is the social cost of monopoly.
So basically, monopolies will start losing more money when they start raising the price since consumers will either 1) not be able to access such services (since they will only make the MIN amount for MAX price and by using calculus, you would rather spend a little more in the amount produced and make a little less profit rather than having an EXACT amount although you would make the best profit IF you sold ALL items) or 2) consumers will just stop using it since cell phone devices are not a NECESSITY but instead a WANT. do you think you will pay whatever cellphone company if the price exceeds a certain comfort zone in your income bracket? you wont.
Furthermore, I will take it one more step. Monopolies can be good. If you look at the Mexican carrier, Telcel. The year Telcel was monopolized by Carlos Slim (riches man in the world now) coverage in Mexico grew more than it did in the hands of the state. According to the "monopoly=bad" argument, service in Mexico should have dropped in every other city that is not important in Mexico's economy while service should have exploded in cities such as Mexico City and Puebla. No, it exploded in the main cities while it also exploded with the whole country
In conclusion, monopolies are only dangerous IF the monopoly is a necessity based. i.e. lets say one man owned the whole united states food supply. Then yes, monopolies would be the worst. But not cell phone companies, cmon if monopolies were SOO good for the company why would Bell even break up his own company? just for the lulz? I dont think so. Because the government told him so? I certainly dont believe it since Bell probably would have had the power to lobby his way out and in case nothing worked he couldve just brought it up to the Supreme Court.
Anyways, enough with the economics jargon. Enjoy your economics class :P
Well, this is macrumors and i try to stay away from economic theories, but you asked for it, so here we go:
Monopolies cause "allocative deadweight loss" (although its main argument applies towards state-owned enterprises)
What does that mean?
In a competitive market, producers dont have the freedom to set a price because the rival can always undercut them until the point where lowering the price will cause in a loss.
BUT the monopolist firm can decide the price it charges by varying the quantity it produces, so it will produce only up to the quantity where its profit is maximized. UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES, the level of output is lower than the socially optimal one, which is where the max price a consumer is willing to pay is the same as the minimum price that the producer requires in order not to lose money.
When the amount produced is LESS than the socially optimal quantity, it means not serving some consumers who are perfectly willing to pay MORE than the minimum price that the producer requires but who are unwilling to bear the price at which the monopoly firm can max its profit. The unfulfilled desire of those neglected consumers is the social cost of monopoly.
So basically, monopolies will start losing more money when they start raising the price since consumers will either 1) not be able to access such services (since they will only make the MIN amount for MAX price and by using calculus, you would rather spend a little more in the amount produced and make a little less profit rather than having an EXACT amount although you would make the best profit IF you sold ALL items) or 2) consumers will just stop using it since cell phone devices are not a NECESSITY but instead a WANT. do you think you will pay whatever cellphone company if the price exceeds a certain comfort zone in your income bracket? you wont.
Furthermore, I will take it one more step. Monopolies can be good. If you look at the Mexican carrier, Telcel. The year Telcel was monopolized by Carlos Slim (riches man in the world now) coverage in Mexico grew more than it did in the hands of the state. According to the "monopoly=bad" argument, service in Mexico should have dropped in every other city that is not important in Mexico's economy while service should have exploded in cities such as Mexico City and Puebla. No, it exploded in the main cities while it also exploded with the whole country
In conclusion, monopolies are only dangerous IF the monopoly is a necessity based. i.e. lets say one man owned the whole united states food supply. Then yes, monopolies would be the worst. But not cell phone companies, cmon if monopolies were SOO good for the company why would Bell even break up his own company? just for the lulz? I dont think so. Because the government told him so? I certainly dont believe it since Bell probably would have had the power to lobby his way out and in case nothing worked he couldve just brought it up to the Supreme Court.
Anyways, enough with the economics jargon. Enjoy your economics class :P
more...
Pipian
Feb 18, 11:23 AM
I meant that I hadn't noticed it before 10.3.8, but I like it..
Rowlander
Dec 5, 03:21 PM
...
Nothing quite brings the same joy to my heart as starting a render in FCP and having a look at Activity Monitor, and seeing a whopping two cores in use. Or having to export a QT file first because I can't send directly to Compressor.
Well to be fair, the camera manufacturers are twats for recording to a delivery codec in the first place
I agree 100% with both of your posts. It still bothers me that compressor is the only application that can make full use of both my Mac Pro�s CPUs.
And I really hate the look of low bitrate AVCHD but we have to work with it nonetheless.
Nothing quite brings the same joy to my heart as starting a render in FCP and having a look at Activity Monitor, and seeing a whopping two cores in use. Or having to export a QT file first because I can't send directly to Compressor.
Well to be fair, the camera manufacturers are twats for recording to a delivery codec in the first place
I agree 100% with both of your posts. It still bothers me that compressor is the only application that can make full use of both my Mac Pro�s CPUs.
And I really hate the look of low bitrate AVCHD but we have to work with it nonetheless.
more...
Inhale420
Oct 30, 02:19 PM
no, but it's a good indicator that you're smoking crack.
MacDawg
Feb 22, 06:05 PM
News thread (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1100615)
more...
JAT
Apr 7, 03:04 PM
You know the new games would be more interesting if played like that too. These first person shooter games are ridiculous because you keep getting back up after dying. The thing is that it doesn't seem as boring to play like that because the scenery of the game keeps changing. But try having two people play as far as possible with one life or three if that is standard and go as far as possible on that. I bet it is a better game if you play with the rul that you start over when you die in the game.
That's why the most common scenario for Goldeneye tournaments, real or not, was One Shot Kill.
That's why the most common scenario for Goldeneye tournaments, real or not, was One Shot Kill.
caspersoong
Apr 7, 07:26 AM
I'll just wait until they start selling music and videos in my country.
more...
AP_piano295
Mar 16, 03:47 PM
Wow...I could give a damn what she was wearing she isn't asking to be raped.
It's interesting how similar hardcore Christian conservatives are to hardcore conservative Muslims.
It's interesting how similar hardcore Christian conservatives are to hardcore conservative Muslims.
sassenach74
Jul 10, 07:23 PM
Oh well, no responses....on the bright side it could mean a better chance of me getting my hands on one :p
more...
Full of Win
Apr 28, 11:07 PM
Which Apple product uses a trace of stylus???
The concept for an Apple phone/computer from 1983.
http://www.frogdesign.com/images/1983_iphone.jpg
The concept for an Apple phone/computer from 1983.
http://www.frogdesign.com/images/1983_iphone.jpg
���h�?
Oct 18, 01:56 PM
Nice idea, just needs a funky apple style jazz up.
VoR
Apr 6, 02:26 PM
http://blog.backblaze.com/2009/09/01/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage/
Pretty amazing considering the date and cost....
Much more interested in this sort of solution over the typical enterprise that simply phones up a vendor and orders a SAN.
Pretty amazing considering the date and cost....
Much more interested in this sort of solution over the typical enterprise that simply phones up a vendor and orders a SAN.
vito
Mar 22, 08:46 PM
Going to start queuing early, probably 10am. Anyone else doing the same?
MacBytes
Oct 13, 11:45 PM
Category: Mac Websites
Link: aMSN (for mac) forum opens (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20041014004555)
Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
Approved by Mudbug
Link: aMSN (for mac) forum opens (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20041014004555)
Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
Approved by Mudbug
Mord
Sep 24, 07:13 PM
i dont get parents that dont want their kids to have sex... just does not compute, your son is 18 he can do what he wants.
DudeMartin
Mar 13, 03:12 PM
Haha, probably not - that would be really awkward IMO anyways ...
I don't think porn sites are concerned about implementing the latest technology :)
I don't think porn sites are concerned about implementing the latest technology :)
m3coolpix
Sep 5, 10:13 AM
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q146/atbglenn/Computers/9d60c49a.jpg
Any chance of the original background JPEG?
Pretty please?:D
Any chance of the original background JPEG?
Pretty please?:D
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário